Each month, EASST compiles a list of funding, research, and employment opportunities for East African researchers. To view opportunities available in the month of January, please visit the "Other Opportunities" page here.
Of note, there are several upcoming deadlines to submit papers for international conferences and workshops:
2018 Symposium on Economic Experiments in Developing Countries
The symposium, held in the Netherlands, will bring together the community of scholars who employ laboratory experimental economics methods for research in developing countries. Submissions are invited for papers that involve lab experiments in the field. Submit online by January 22, 2018.
International Workshop on Poverty, Inequality Dynamics, & Economic Development
The workshop, held at Kings College London, will focus on mixed-method research on poverty, inequality, economic development, as well as on their interactions. Refer to their website for additional information on the call for papers. The deadline for submissions of abstracts is January 31st, 2018.
Higher Education and International Development Conference
The conference, hosted at the UCL Institute of Education in London, will address the role of higher education in sustainable development and showcase innovative research in the field. Proposals are welcome for presentations on diverse aspects of higher education in low and middle-income countries, involving empirical research, policy analysis or theoretical engagement. Refer to their website for information on the thematic focus areas. The deadline for submissions of abstracts is February 1st, 2018.
When EASST Fellows come to UC Berkeley, they not only strengthen their networks by meeting with CEGA Affiliates and PhD students, but they also gain access to a wealth of opportunities to collaborate with other programs at CEGA. The following stories illustrate our fellows' connections across CEGA.
Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences (BITSS) Catalysts
BITSS was established by CEGA in 2012 and “aims to enhance the practices of social scientists in ways that promote research transparency, reproducibility, and openness.” One component of the initiative is the Catalyst Program. Similar to the EASST catalyst grant program, which awards fellows grants to train others in impact evaluation, BITSS Catalysts become leaders in the open science movement by passing on their knowledge to others.
EASST Fellows Jayne Tusiime and Kizito Omala first became exposed to BITSS ideas and methods while at Berkeley, and later went on to become BITSS Catalysts. Thus far, they have conducted four research transparency trainings, and have trained over 425 participants. Most recently, Jayne and Kizito were invited to attend the 2017 BITSS Annual Meeting in Berkeley where they met with other catalysts and leaders in the movement.
Fellows’ papers accepted to the Working Group in African Political Economy (WGAPE) January 2018 Meeting
CEGA’s WGAPE program was founded in 2002 and is an international forum for academic researchers who combine deep field research experience in Africa with training in political economy methods. The meetings provide a unique opportunity for researchers to obtain in depth feedback from meeting participants, who have all read the papers that are being discussed. Two of our EASST Fellows, Constantine Manda and Michael Mbate, were recently selected to present their papers at the upcoming meeting in January 2018 at New York University-Abu Dhabi. Constantine’s paper, “Minority Presidents and Ethnic Politics,” analyzes a dataset covering 142 countries and finds that ethnic diversity and ethnic minority leadership has a negative association with the onset of civil war. Michael’s paper utilizes a spatial policy implemented in Kenya to examine the effects of politicians’ strategic interactions on public spending. He finds that “politically motivated adjustments in government spending are associated with significant short-term budgetary distortions.” The misallocation of budgetary resources is welfare reducing and significantly affect public goods with positive externalities. Although this is the first time our fellows will be presenting papers, EASST Fellow involvement in WGAPE predates the January meeting. Several fellows have attended as non-presenters to provide feedback to participants on their papers, and at the WGAPE Spring National Meeting, Michael led the impact evaluation training.
On November 28th, our Fall 2017 EASST Visiting Fellow Dr. Damazo Kadengye traveled to UC San Diego to present his research plan to graduate students and faculty. Damazo’s research focuses on maternal health, and he presented his planned study, “Effectiveness of potential interventions to change social norms on prevalence of intimate partner violence in Uganda: Implications for IPV programming in pregnancy" at UCSD’s Economics Seminar.
Damazo is interested in researching the effectiveness of various programs that aim to curb intimate partner violence (IPV) through countering harmful gender-related norms in Uganda. In addition, he plans to rigorously test whether IPV could be better prevented through integrating tailored couple’s counseling sessions in existing antenatal health programs in Uganda.
Damazo will be presenting his research plan at UC Berkeley’s Development Lunch on Tuesday, December 12th, from 12:30-1:30 in 648 Evans.
EASST’s Program Manager, Maya Ranganath, was recently featured on the NextBillion Blog. Her post, “Three Reasons for the African Research Gap – And How to Close It,” details the key reasons behind the lag in in sub-Saharan Africa’s research outputs and how EASST is narrowing this gap through targeted investments in East African researchers. Read the full post here.
By Alex Dobyan, Administrative Associate, CEGA
The Working Group in African Political Economy (WGAPE) is an international forum for academic researchers who combine deep field research experience in Africa with training in political economy methods. Founded in 2002, the group brings together faculty and advanced graduate students in Political Science and Economics who combine deep field research experience in Africa with training in political economy methods. The group meets semi-annually to discuss the work-in-progress of its regular members and invited guests. WGAPE is committed to incorporating African scholars into the network in order to create and build collaborative relationships, and falls under CEGA’s Global Networks portfolio.
Gaetan Tchakounte Nandong first heard of WGAPE through a course on elections at the African School of Economics taught by Professor Kim Dionne (Assistant Professor of Government at Smith College.) Dionne included a cutting-edge working paper in her syllabus-- Asunka et al.’s “Electoral Fraud or Violence: The Effect of Observers on Party Manipulation Strategies. As the paper hadn’t yet been published, this generated some skepticism of its merits among ASE students – but Dionne was able to point to the paper’s inclusion in a WGAPE meeting as a sign of the paper’s quality, despite it not yet being peer-reviewed. Through this, Gaetan grew interested in WGAPE, and resolved to submit a paper to the meeting. His first submission to WGAPE—a paper that developed a framework to explain absenteeism amongst public healthcare workers in Cameroon—was rejected.
But the news was not all bad. Gaetan still got to travel to Abu Dhabi for the Learning Days activities held before the WGAPE meeting, sponsored by Evidence in Government and Politics (EGAP) and the Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences (BITSS). For three days he and nine other African researchers learned about social science research methods; for Gaetan, randomization strategies proved most useful. However, he felt that the most valuable learning came outside the classroom, during meals and coffee breaks, where he found a group of kindred spirits – other promising researchers in African political economy from around the continent and world, along with a handful of more experienced faculty at major universities in the field.
The experience was so valuable that Gaetan resubmitted a paper to WGAPE’s national meeting at Berkeley this past June. This time, he tried a different approach, submitting a design for a new project on varying levels of entrepreneurship among different ethnic groups in Cameroon. As he describes it, “The Bamileke ancestral tradition for instance, contains particular features which according to anthropologists, explain the natives’ self-employment attitudes. Most of children in the Bamileke localities have their own part of the farm – they sell outputs and manage the income themselves. We therefore became interested in examining how traditions relate to entrepreneurship following these observations.” Gaetan and his co-author propose that pre-colonial institutions shaped the attitudes of Cameroonians in ways that persist to this day, and have designed an experiment that will recruit participants from across Cameroon to play economic games that will empirically test attitudes towards entrepreneurship among different groups.
This time, his research design was accepted, making Gaetan one of two African researchers to present at the meeting, and the only one based on the African continent. With support from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, WGAPE also sponsored five non-presenting African scholars to attend the meeting. Together, these seven scholars, including Gaetan, attended a training session conducted by EASST fellow Michael Mbate, the Annual Bank Conference on Africa, and a Research Transparency and Reproducibility Training sponsored by BITSS.
His research is on hold while he begins his graduate work at Princeton, but the WGAPE experience has stuck with him. “The feedback was very helpful for a novice researcher like me. It’s always a pleasure to have experienced researchers reading and commenting on your work.” Gaetan still keeps in touch with the researchers he connected with at WGAPE, seeking advice and trading comments on ongoing projects.
The BRAC-CEGA Learning Collaborative (BCLC) is a partnership between CEGA and BRAC that has the goal of institutionalizing rigorous impact evaluation within BRAC. Similar to EASST, BCLC builds capacity through hosting BRAC researchers as visiting fellows at UC Berkeley and funding collaborative research projects. The BCLC worked with BRAC Bangladesh from 2012 to 2015, and has been recently re-launched to work with BRAC International in Uganda with generous funding from the International Development Research Center (IDRC).
To keep up the momentum of the collaboration, BCLC launched a travel grant competition in the spring of 2017. The grant was designed to award CEGA faculty affiliates and their PhD students to visit BRAC field offices to develop new research projects, start new partnerships, or to bolster existing partnerships with BRAC. In the research sphere, face-to-face meetings catalyze the collaborative process, by building trust and initiating relationships that are difficult to forge virtually and across time zones-- it is hoped that these grants will lead to long-lasting collaborations.
The following post was written by Gregory Lane, who was awarded a travel grant to Bangladesh. Lane is a PhD student at UC Berkeley's Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics (ARE).
In late 2013, a team of UCB researchers (including Elisabeth Sadoulet, Alain de Janvry, and myself) began collaboration with BRAC Microfinance’s Research and Development Unit (RDU) on developing a new financial product. The goal was to produce a new tool that could be used to help clients effectively respond to unforeseen income shocks. The more traditional microfinance products already used by BRAC were too rigid to be used in this manner, as the institution requires full repayment of any previous loan before offering additional credit. After a year of consultation, we produced a product called the Emergency Loan. This new loan is a pre-approved, index-based credit product that is to be made available to qualified BRAC clients in the event of a flood (later to be expanded to other types of income shocks). Its purpose is to remove some of the downside risk arising from weather shocks, thus encouraging greater investment in productive, but risky technologies (high value crops), while also allowing faster recovery.
A full-scale evaluation of the Emergency Loan via an RCT began during the summer of 2016. However, during the first year of the experiment we encountered some administrative difficulties that limited the power of the experiment. Specially, in certain branches the Branch Manager did not spend enough time informing eligible clients when the loans were made available (i.e. when the floods had exceeded the pre-determined threshold). Furthermore, we found that BRAC’s Loan Officer incentives were not aligned with ensuring that clients had the opportunity to take an Emergency Loan. First, Loan Officers perceived the Emergency Loan as risky and they feared that lower repayment rates would reflect poorly on them. Second, Loan Officers were only directly incentivized to disburse traditional loans. In some situations, this caused Loan Officers to encourage clients to wait until a traditional loan became available rather than take an Emergency Loan right away. In all, these issues combined to reduce the number of loans that were actually disbursed.
To address these problems, I traveled to Dhaka in May 2017 with funding from the BRAC-CEGA Travel Grant to work with BRAC’s RDU to implement changes for the second year of the experiment. Together, we agreed to implement several adjustments. First, both Branch Managers and Loan Officers would have Emergency Loan disbursals count towards their yearly incentives for loans disbursed. Second, a memo was distributed to all branches that management would not weigh delinquent Emergency Loans as heavily in the evaluation criteria for each Loan Officer and Branch Manager. Third, we informed branches that there would be regular in-person check-ins from the head office management to ensure that clients were well informed about their eligibility and that after a flood all eligible clients were notified about the loan activation. Together it is hoped that these changes to the incentive structure will ensure that every eligible BRAC client would have the opportunity to take an Emergency Loan should the need arise.
During this time in Dhaka, we also began discussions on possible future collaborations between UCB and BRAC’s RDU. In particular, we explored the possibility of examining the effects of bKash (a mobile money platform) integration with BRAC’s microfinance operations, a process that will begin in the coming years. The project would examine how this integration changes participation in microfinance, savings rates, and overall portfolio health.
EASST seeks to train researchers in rigorous impact evaluation methods with the ultimate goal of producing high-quality, locally-generated evidence for policymaking. Impact Evaluations are often considered the most effective way to show causal links between a program and its effects on populations. However, there remain several debates on how findings from an impact evaluation in one context can be successfully translated to another context.
J-PAL’s Mary Ann Bates and Rachel Glennerster call this debate “the generalizability puzzle” – and put forward a compelling “generalizability framework” for policy makers to use in their exploration of whether a solution would be appropriate for their context. The authors elegantly argue that focusing on underlying causal mechanisms and specific “human behaviours” behind why an evaluation was successful, married with crucial local data, would be the best way to translate findings to other contexts. They provide the example of a study that found that providing lentils proved an effective incentive to people’s decision to vaccinate in rural India. It would be hardly possible to pick up this program and drop it into another context—different cultures’ food preferences and ways of accessing food are different, as a start. But there are valuable lessons embedded in the mechanism behind why the incentive worked that could apply to increasing demand for preventative care measures elsewhere.
Bates and Glennerster provide several examples of how to use their framework to apply the findings of particular interventions to other contexts. In one example, they discuss J-PAL Africa’s work to scale up the “Sugar Daddies Risk Awareness” HIV-prevention program that was successful in Kenya in the Rwandan context. J-PAL Africa worked with the Rwanda Biomedical Center (directed by EASST fellow Jeanine Condo) to collect descriptive data. This program, which involves showing teenagers a video revealing that older men have higher HIV rates—significantly reduced the number of sexual relationships between teenage girls and older men and therefore girls’ risk of HIV transmission in Kenya. However, working with the RBC’s data revealed that most teenage girls in Rwanda already knew that older men had a higher relative risk of HIV. Along with this, teenage girls tended to overestimate men’s HIV risk as whole. This shows that if the Kenya program had been dropped into Rwanda without careful consideration of the mechanisms at play in the Rwandan context, it may have resulted in unprotected sex increasing because of girls’ realizations that HIV risk wasn’t as high as they thought. Therefore, J-PAL Africa recommended pursuing different mechanisms for addressing this problem in Rwanda.
The authors conclude that, “if researchers and policy makers continue to view results of impact evaluations as a black box and fail to focus on mechanisms, the movement toward evidence-based policy making will fall far short of its potential for improving people’s lives.”
To read the full article, click here.
Since 2012, EASST has sponsored 20 East African researchers to complete visiting fellowships at UC Berkeley. While at Berkeley, fellows receive deep training in impact evaluation through coursework and close faculty and PhD student mentorship. Upon completing the fellowship, researchers are eligible to receive seed funding to conduct trainings, research, and to work with policymakers.
“I am an epidemiologist and I had never considered the role of Economics in public health until I learned about Development Economics through EASST. This knowledge has made me understand and better appreciate public health problems and how they impact development in resource-limited settings. My research focus has now changed from mere public health concerns to how they impact development among the poor.”- Jayne Byakika Tusiime
Jayne, who came to Berkeley in Fall 2016, is currently serving as a Senior Lecturer and Head of Department of Public Health at Busitema University in Uganda. Her current research is on determining the impact of solid floors on soil transmitted infections among children in Uganda. As a BITSS catalyst, starting in October she will be conducting awareness workshops about research transparency in universities across Uganda.
In June of this year, Jayne received an EASST Policy and Partnerships Grant. Through this grant she will design an impact evaluation of the Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs) program, launched by the Ministry of Health in Uganda. In addition to fostering connections with policy makers and CEGA partner institutions in East Africa, an important component of the EASST Fellowship is for fellows to go back to their home institutions and build capacity at the local and institutional level to conduct training and research, especially in the area of impact evaluation. To attain this objective, fellows are awarded catalyst grants upon return to their home country. With the support of the catalyst grant, Jayne is working on a curriculum for an Impact Evaluation course to be introduced at Busitema University this academic year.
“EASST has been a booster to my career. Before I attended the fellowship at UC-Berkeley, I was a junior lecturer, and have since been able to raise research funds and publish in reputable journals and consequently promoted to the position of Associate Professor. As a result of training fellow faculty and students on impact evaluation, I have been considered for a position in research and extension where I will be setting up an evaluation institute. With EASST I have grown so much professionally and I have the right skills to position myself for the future in research, scholarly activities and impact to the society.”- Amos Njuguna
Amos, who came to Berkeley in Spring 2013, is currently an Assistant Professor of Finance at the United States International University in Kenya. In 2016, he conducted a primary study on financial products available to micro-agro-processors in Kenya. The project also examined the incompatibility of product design and the needs of agro-processors. Through this study, Amos custom- designed financial products for the agro-processors, to test via experimentation. With the support of his catalyst grant, Amos lectured on experimental methods for impact evaluation at a workshop held in 2015 by the Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund (SIEF) at the World Bank and UNICEF.
By Chelsea Downs and Kizito Omala
Launched in 2016, the EASST Policy and Partnerships Grant provides a new opportunity for EASST Fellows to foster new connections with policy makers and CEGA partner institutions within East Africa. These small grants are competitively awarded to fellows to facilitate their involvement with scale-up activities, policy convenings, or the creation of new working relationships with relevant stakeholders to expand the reach of impact evaluations. Kizito Omala, who completed his EASST fellowship in 2015 and is now a full-time Lecturer with Makerere University at the Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, was awarded the Policy and Partnership Grant to assist J-PAL Africa to scale up the Teach at the Right Level (TaRL) intervention with the Ministry of Education in Uganda. A former teacher in the Ugandan school system himself, Omala is deeply dedicated to bettering education systems to enhance children’s learning-- he is currently engaged in another EASST funded research project which investigates the effects of mandatory transfers of teachers on teacher absenteeism.
J-PAL’s TaRL intervention emerged in response to widespread research that demonstrated that over half of students in grade 5 cannot read at grade 2 levels, and an even greater proportion cannot perform basic math functions. TaRL targets this by assessing students abilities and grouping them by their learning level, rather than by their age group, which has been found to significantly improves test scores. With additional research pointing to similar findings in Kenya and Ghana, “teaching at the right level” has revealed itself as having high potential to address several key education problems in various African countries. However, it remains necessary that scale-up efforts take into account evidence about the local context.
Through the grant, Omala was able to assist J-PAL Africa in investigating whether TaRL would be an effective scale-up in Uganda. Omala was able to forge several connections for J-PAL Africa with the Ministry of Education, RTI, the National Curriculum Development Centre, and other key players in the Ugandan education space. He assisted with designing a sample-based survey, and prepared a joint presentation of TaRL evidence with J-PAL Africa to Ugandan Ministry of Education officials, which yielded approval for preliminary discussions with stakeholders and piloting of this survey. Later this year, a participatory workshop is planned for key stakeholders in Uganda to arrive at a consensus of the teaching and support models that could be piloted across selected districts based on an experimental study design in preparation for the TaRL scale-up.
The Policy and Partnerships grant has also funded EASST Fellow Jayne Tusiime to design an impact evaluation of the Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs) program, launched by the Ministry of Health in Uganda (future developments to follow). The competition has been recently relaunched, and the EASST team is confident that these grants will facilitate strong local connections and enhance CEGA’s efforts to ensure that rigorous research will eventually inform policies that affect the lives of vulnerable populations in East Africa.
Every month, EASST compiles a list of funding, research, and employment opportunities for East African researchers. To view a complete list of the opportunities available in August, please visit the “Other Opportunities” page of the EASST website. A few highlights below:
CEGA’s Digital Credit Observatory has just launched a Request for Proposals, inviting researchers to apply for funding for rigorous studies addressing questions around the impacts of digital credit on consumers in emerging markets; how various borrower characteristics (financial literacy, gender ,etc) could have an effect on these impacts; and how non-traditional credit-scoring algorithms, regulations, and other consumer protection measures can be designed to minimize consumer risk. Please apply for this exciting opportunity by September 15th!
Sign up for CEGA’s Berkeley Initiative for the Social Sciences (BITSS) recently launched Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) to learn about Transparent and Open Social Science Research! This engaging new course is free and designed to be accessible to anyone from a graduate student to a policy-maker, and includes learning units in cutting edge topics such as data visualization and meta-analysis. Please register by September 8th to be included in the first course-run!
EASST’s close partner the African Population and Health Research Centre (APHRC) is looking to hire up to five researchers to work in the following units: Data and Measurement, Aging and Development, Urbanization and Wellbeing, and Population Dynamics and Sexual and Reproductive Health & Rights. Applications will be considered on a rolling basis.